Posted: 2012-03-18 13:04:45
Ant Movie Catalog 4.1.1 [BETA] update (18/03/12) released ! 
Please see first post for more details!
Soulsnake.
Please see first post for more details!
Soulsnake.
antp.be forum
Official Forum
https://forum.antp.be/phpbb3/
[FR][EN] Ant Movie Catalog 4.2.1 (04/11/17)
Page 21 of 39
Posted: 2012-03-20 09:19:47
Just let me say a thousand thanks. I'm very new to this program and i'm amazed on what you're doing here.
Posted: 2012-03-23 17:12:21
tout d'abord merci pour ce soft qui evolue encore
cependant comme cité plus haut ds le post j'utilise le template 4.0 from bergware et lorsque je cree mon fichier XML, les dates sortent au format yyyy-mm-dd; hors pour que le tri sur la colonne date d'ajout se fasse il faudrait qu'elles soient au format dd-mm-yyyy.
j'ai bien installé la version 4.1.1 du 18/03 mais cela n'a rien changé lors de l'export xml....sous la version 3.5.1 c'etait OK et apres un rapide test sur ce template çà marche donc cela vient bien du format de la date d'ajout.
de plus je ne peux plus utiliser la version 3.5.1.2 car ma base ne s'ouvre plus :j'imagine qu'il n'y a pas de retrocompatibilité.
y a t-il une solution à mon prob ?
et encore merci pour le temps passé à développer ce soft que j'utilise depuis qqs années déja.
Cdt
cependant comme cité plus haut ds le post j'utilise le template 4.0 from bergware et lorsque je cree mon fichier XML, les dates sortent au format yyyy-mm-dd; hors pour que le tri sur la colonne date d'ajout se fasse il faudrait qu'elles soient au format dd-mm-yyyy.
j'ai bien installé la version 4.1.1 du 18/03 mais cela n'a rien changé lors de l'export xml....sous la version 3.5.1 c'etait OK et apres un rapide test sur ce template çà marche donc cela vient bien du format de la date d'ajout.
de plus je ne peux plus utiliser la version 3.5.1.2 car ma base ne s'ouvre plus :j'imagine qu'il n'y a pas de retrocompatibilité.
y a t-il une solution à mon prob ?
et encore merci pour le temps passé à développer ce soft que j'utilise depuis qqs années déja.
Cdt
Posted: 2012-03-24 08:35:31
Bonjour gigi1250,
Avec AMC 3.5.1 les dates sortaient au format local (en fonction des paramètres de Windows) et donc pouvaient poser des problèmes lorsque l'on utilise sa base sur une autre machine qui n'a pas le même format de dates.
C'est pour cela que maintenant les dates sortent TOUJOURS au format yyyy-mm-dd.
Pour ton problème avec le template, il faut modifier la façon dont est lu la date. J'ai regardé et il suffit de remplacer ces lignes 571-575:
par:
Tu peux aussi télécharger le fichier modifié ici:
http://mickaelvanneufville.online.fr/AM ... _Bergware/
Soulsnake.
Effectivement les dates sortent au format yyyy-mm-dd avec AMC 4.1.X.lorsque je cree mon fichier XML, les dates sortent au format yyyy-mm-dd; hors pour que le tri sur la colonne date d'ajout se fasse il faudrait qu'elles soient au format dd-mm-yyyy.
Avec AMC 3.5.1 les dates sortaient au format local (en fonction des paramètres de Windows) et donc pouvaient poser des problèmes lorsque l'on utilise sa base sur une autre machine qui n'a pas le même format de dates.
C'est pour cela que maintenant les dates sortent TOUJOURS au format yyyy-mm-dd.
Pour ton problème avec le template, il faut modifier la façon dont est lu la date. J'ai regardé et il suffit de remplacer ces lignes 571-575:
Code: Select all
switch (system){
case 'dmy': ymd=function(s){return s?(s.slice(6)+s.slice(3,5)+s.slice(0,2))*1:0;}; break;
case 'mdy': ymd=function(s){return s?(s.slice(6)+s.slice(0,2)+s.slice(3,5))*1:0;}; break;
case 'ymd': ymd=function(s){return s?(s.slice(0,4)+s.slice(5,7)+s.slice(8))*1:0;}; break;
default : ymd=function(s){return s?s:0;};}Code: Select all
// AMC 3.5.1
/*switch (system){
case 'dmy': ymd=function(s){return s?(s.slice(6)+s.slice(3,5)+s.slice(0,2))*1:0;}; break;
case 'mdy': ymd=function(s){return s?(s.slice(6)+s.slice(0,2)+s.slice(3,5))*1:0;}; break;
case 'ymd': ymd=function(s){return s?(s.slice(0,4)+s.slice(5,7)+s.slice(8))*1:0;}; break;
default : ymd=function(s){return s?s:0;};}*/
// AMC 4.1.0
ymd=function(s){return s?(s.slice(0,4)+s.slice(5,7)+s.slice(8))*1:0;};http://mickaelvanneufville.online.fr/AM ... _Bergware/
Tu as la possibilité d'enregistrer ta base au format 3.5.1 avec AMC 4.1.X si tu souhaite revenir à la version 3.5.1 mais tu perdras les ajouts de la version 4.1.X comme les champs personnalisés.de plus je ne peux plus utiliser la version 3.5.1.2 car ma base ne s'ouvre plus :j'imagine qu'il n'y a pas de retrocompatibilité.
Soulsnake.
Posted: 2012-03-25 11:35:07
super soulsnake un grand merci à toi ;je vais mettre le lien de téléchargement du template dans le bon topic (si ce n'est deja fait)
t'es un chef
t'es un chef
Posted: 2012-04-04 17:51:41
Thanks a lot for new version.
I have found 2 bugs with 4.1.1 beta:
- When importing media files, file sizes are not imported,
- Check boxes in thumbnails do not follow setting "Checkboxes with background color associated to movie color tag". E.g if it's disabled, colored checkboxes are still displayed under thumbs. As I think about it now, it might not be a bug since there is no other way to tell color tag
I have found 2 bugs with 4.1.1 beta:
- When importing media files, file sizes are not imported,
- Check boxes in thumbnails do not follow setting "Checkboxes with background color associated to movie color tag". E.g if it's disabled, colored checkboxes are still displayed under thumbs. As I think about it now, it might not be a bug since there is no other way to tell color tag
Posted: 2012-04-04 18:29:02
I'm also experiencing the problem with the file sizes not being recognized on new entries...
Posted: 2012-04-04 20:57:39
Thanks, I found the bug.- When importing media files, file sizes are not imported
- I'm also experiencing the problem with the file sizes not being recognized on new entries...
The bug appears only if you choose to import file size like this '700+715' in preferences
.It will be fixed in next release.
This is normal, it is not a bug.- Check boxes in thumbnails do not follow setting "Checkboxes with background color associated to movie color tag". E.g if it's disabled, colored checkboxes are still displayed under thumbs. As I think about it now, it might not be a bug since there is no other way to tell color tag
If you don't want color tag as background in checkboxes, it is what is done.
I think you think it is a bug because checkboxes in thumbs are same with or without color tag as background but this is normal.
If you don't want checkboxes in thumbs, you just have to uncheck this option in preferences
.Soulsnake.
Posted: 2012-04-05 02:16:36
Thank You for the speedy response, soulsnake
Just wondering if it might be possible to have the actual byte-size of the file imported? (such as 4,321,500,601 Bytes)
I'm considering converting to that format so as to better know which rip I have in my catalog, when comparing to other rips online.
Just wondering if it might be possible to have the actual byte-size of the file imported? (such as 4,321,500,601 Bytes)
I'm considering converting to that format so as to better know which rip I have in my catalog, when comparing to other rips online.
Posted: 2012-04-05 15:45:40
Ah, now I see how it works. Then I believe option "Checkboxes with background color associated to movie color tag" should be under "Checkboxes (right click...)" and not under "Checkboxes in thumbnails display" since it affects former option and not latter.soulsnake wrote: This is normal, it is not a bug.
If you don't want color tag as background in checkboxes, it is what is done.
I think you think it is a bug because checkboxes in thumbs are same with or without color tag as background but this is normal.
If you don't want checkboxes in thumbs, you just have to uncheck this option in preferences
Posted: 2012-04-06 08:34:15
You can chose the unit to use in the Preferences -> Media File Importation.GnomesRUs wrote: Just wondering if it might be possible to have the actual byte-size of the file imported? (such as 4,321,500,601 Bytes)
But that affects only the new imports, it won't convert those already in the database.
Posted: 2012-04-06 15:02:35
My goodness - I've been using AMC so long that I'd forgotten that setting was even there!antp wrote:You can chose the unit to use in the Preferences -> Media File Importation.GnomesRUs wrote: Just wondering if it might be possible to have the actual byte-size of the file imported? (such as 4,321,500,601 Bytes)
But that affects only the new imports, it won't convert those already in the database.
Thank You, soulsnake
Posted: 2012-04-07 09:38:44
This time it was not soulsnake who replied 
Posted: 2012-04-07 10:11:13
Posted: 2012-04-07 15:16:48
So sorry, Antoine...Too many hours staring at the computer screen!
Posted: 2012-04-07 15:51:58
Any idea why i have no Decimals when importing media?
eg. 3976875804 Bytes, which makes it hard to read.
eg. 3976875804 Bytes, which makes it hard to read.
Posted: 2012-04-07 17:08:22
It is designed that way.
But indeed maybe using thousands separator would make it more readable (not decimal separator, as it is an integer value). The problem is that adding such feature (even if is very small) will either make a different behaviour from previous version (which may annoy some users) or will require one more option...
But indeed maybe using thousands separator would make it more readable (not decimal separator, as it is an integer value). The problem is that adding such feature (even if is very small) will either make a different behaviour from previous version (which may annoy some users) or will require one more option...
Posted: 2012-04-10 18:18:31
Ant Movie Catalog 4.1.1 [BETA] update (10/04/12) released !
Please see first post for more details!
Soulsnake.
Please see first post for more details!
Soulsnake.
Re: [FR][EN] Ant Movie Catalog 4.1.1 [BETA] (10/04/12)
Posted: 2012-04-10 20:21:32
is it normal than there are 3 tabs?soulsnake wrote: - Add possibility to display movie fields and custom fields in same tab (require at least a resolution screen of 1024 x 600 pixels).
movie fields, custom fiels, and the one with both
Shouldn't it be either the two fields, or no tabs and then show all fiends together?
Posted: 2012-04-10 20:52:41
Hi,
Yes, this is normal.
I put this like this because this view is unsuitable for small screens.
So, like this you can choose how to display fields according to user preferences and constraints on the size of the screen.
But if you have a better idea, I'm interested.
Soulsnake.
Yes, this is normal.
I put this like this because this view is unsuitable for small screens.
So, like this you can choose how to display fields according to user preferences and constraints on the size of the screen.
But if you have a better idea, I'm interested
.Soulsnake.